S & E Contractors, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1DissentSkelton, Judge
This court should not consider nor act on the alleged “appeal” filed by the Attorney General in this case for the reasons set forth below.
There is no Controversy Between the Plaintiff and the Atomic Energy Commission on the Facts or the Law in This Case
It is elementary that a court will not consider a case unless there is a controversy between the parties on the facts or on the law, or both. No such controversy exists here. The contract was made between the plaintiff and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). They included the standard “disputes” clause in the agreement which established the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.