Blazier v. Western Pipe & Steel Co.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The above-entitled cause heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is now decided as follows:
Judgment will be for the plaintiffs, other than Blazier, Brown and Manser, for double the unpaid amounts, said amounts to be computed by counsel in accordance with Local Rule 7, Subdivision (h).
The Court also awards the plaintiffs th*. sum of $75 as an attorney’s fee.
Comment
It is established beyond dispute that the plaintiffs were required to, and did, report before the actual beginning of the work day. They, therefore, performed services for which they were entitled to be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Sterling v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Roper v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Cartridge Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949