Legal Opinion
Greathouse v. Rhodes
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 2000No. Docket 214434PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.
In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals as of right from the jury’s verdict of no cause of action. Plaintiff challenges the trial court’s rulings (1) denying her motion to strike defendant Dr. Charles Rhodes’ expert witnesses on the ground that they were not qualified under MCL 600.2169(l)(a); MSA 27A.2169(l)(a) to testify regarding the standard of care, and (2) denying her request to use learned treatises to question her expert witnesses on direct-examination in order to establish that their opinions were supported by “peer review publications” and met other requirements of MCL…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cox v. Flint Board of Hospital ManagersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Chapin v. a & L PARTS, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bouverette v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hilgendorf v. St. John Hosp. and Medical Center Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Tobin v. Providence HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.