Legal Opinion
In Re Untalan
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 1993No. 90-SP-91PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
On July 13, 1989, respondent upon entry of a plea of nolo contendere was convicted in the Superior Court of Guam for criminal facilitation of a felony of the second degree, theft by deception, which is a misdemeanor under 9 G.C.A. § 4.65. 1 On September 20, 1990, the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) deter mined that the crime for which respondent was convicted did not involve moral turpitude per se within the meaning of D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1989 Repl.). 2 The case was referred to a Hearing Committee for a determination of whether respondent’s conduct involved moral…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of ShillaireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mark D. Talley v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re SpiridonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re HopmayerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re PattersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re SneedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.