Legal Opinion

Luck v. Louisville N.R. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Plaintiff was an employee of the defendant railroad, engaged as a laborer in connection with railroad bridge construction and repair work. He sues under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U. S. C. A., sects. 51-59) for injuries to his spine and kidneys caused by a strain to the back, suffered while engaged with other workmen in loading boxes on a train from a platform. He alleges in this declaration that while so engaged his foot slipped in or on grease, or oil, on this platform, which was wet after rain, and that the railroad was actually negligent in failing to provide a safe place…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AebySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kurn v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  2. Merritt v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co. v. ShacklettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  4. Barlovich v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API