People v. Squier
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the People failed to introduce sufficient evidence pursuant to CPL 60.50 to corroborate his confession and sustain his conviction. We disagree. The corroboration requirement of CPL 60.50 is satisfied "by the production of some proof, of whatever weight, that a crime was committed by someone” (People v Daniels, 37 NY2d 624, 629). The People met that requirement by introducing the testimony of the victim that his home had been broken into, that items were stolen therefrom, and that one of the stolen items was recovered from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. GeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. TraitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. KnightonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- KNIGHTON, JAMES, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. KnightonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.