Legal Opinion
Ransom v. HG Hill Company
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1959PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ms. Justice Burnett
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The trial judge found in favor of the employer and insurance carrier but made no finding of fact. He merely stated in his order that:
“* * * the Court finds the issues joined in favor of the defendants and against the petitioner.”
The obvious reasons for such a finding will hereinafter be referred to.
The petitioner is a Negro man, 54 years of age, and was employed as a truck driver for H. G. Hill Company, a retail grocery chain store. The warehouse and parking area for the truck was located at 2nd…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Matter of Ognibene v. Rochester Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Gillmore v. Ring Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- Maltais v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
- Claim of Miles v. Gibbs & Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hughes v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Insurance Company of America v. HogsettTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
- Southern Cotton Oil Division v. ChildressSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.