Legal Opinion

Kalinowski v. Truck Equipment Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The complaint alleges that defendant Truck Equipment Co., Inc., did work upon a truck belonging to the other defendant. A new body, a new rear axle and new wheels were supplied and such a transformation made that the finished vehicle was a rebuilt truck rather than a repair job. Later on while the truck was being driven on the street by its owner the rear axle broke, a wheel came off, ran up over a curb to the sidewalk and against plaintiff Rita Kalinowski, causing her physical injuries. She has sued both the Truck Equipment Co., Inc., and the truck owner. Defendant truck company has moved…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Rosebrock v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. McLeod Ex Rel. McLeod v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Central & Southern Truck Lines, Inc. v. Westfall GMC Truck, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Vrooman v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Griffith v. Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Foy v. Ed Taussig, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API