Legal Opinion

O'Malley v. Eagan

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1931No. 1677PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bltxme, Justice.

Plaintiff was injured as a result of a collision on June 8, 1929, between a Buick automobile driven by the defendant Phillip S. Mahoney and a Chevrolet automobile driven by one Dan F. Eagan. Both Mahoney and Eagan were sued. The latter entered a special appearance on account of want of proper service of summons. A change of venue was taken from Natrona to Sheridan County, and the cause was tried against the defendant Mahoney alone, and he will hereafter be referred to as the defendant. The jury empanelled in the cause returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hines v. SweeneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hester v. Coliseum Motor Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bragdon v. KelloggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Torgeson v. ConnellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Buckley v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Horton Ex Rel. Estate of Scott v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Jones v. SchabronWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API