Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Chater
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 29, 1996No. 94-4183-RDRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
This is a social security appeal which is now before the court upon plaintiffs motions for an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) (the Social Security Act) and 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (the Equal Access to Justice Act or “EAJA”). Doe. Nos. 19 and 20. Three issues are raised by these motions: 1) whether plaintiff is entitled to fees under § 406(b)(1)(A); 2) whether plaintiff is entitled to fees under the EAJA; and 3) if plaintiff is entitled to a fee award, how much should the award be.
Prior to the motions for fees now before the court, this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donald G. Hargis v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Robert T. HUSTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Gilbert v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Mary KOSS, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Spicer v. CalifanoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hodges-Williams v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- McGraw v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2005
- Hartter v. ChaterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Bennett v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2005