Redevelopment Authority v. Serafin
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
In the case at bar, preliminary objections were filed by Stanley Serafín and Mary, his wife, et al. (Appellants) to a declaration of taking of the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Wilkes-Barre (Appellee). The Court of Common Pleas dismissed these objections. Judge Podcasy has most ably presented both the facts and law in his opinion below, and for these reasons, we adopt his opinion, which as yet is unreported. That opinion states:
“We have before us Preliminary Objections filed by defendants, Stanley Serafín and Mary A. Serafín, *340husband and wife, to a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Price v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Schwartz v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Simco Stores v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by1 opinion
- Redevelopment Authority v. SerafinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979