Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Authority v. Serafin

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1976No. Appeal, No. 441 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

In the case at bar, preliminary objections were filed by Stanley Serafín and Mary, his wife, et al. (Appellants) to a declaration of taking of the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Wilkes-Barre (Appellee). The Court of Common Pleas dismissed these objections. Judge Podcasy has most ably presented both the facts and law in his opinion below, and for these reasons, we adopt his opinion, which as yet is unreported. That opinion states:

“We have before us Preliminary Objections filed by defendants, Stanley Serafín and Mary A. Serafín, *340husband and wife, to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Price v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Schwartz v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Simco Stores v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Redevelopment Authority v. SerafinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API