Irving v. Burgess & Town Council
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 281, Jan. T., 1899, by-defendant, from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1898, No. 78, affirming judgment of C. P. Delaware Co., March T., 1894, No., 154, on verdict for plaintiffs. Appeal from Superior Court. This was an action of trespass to recover damages for the diversion of the waters of a private stream called Ridley creek. The following facts appear by the report of this case in 10 Pa.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 281, Jan. T., 1899, by-defendant, from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1898, No. 78, affirming judgment of C. P. Delaware Co., March T., 1894, No., 154, on verdict for plaintiffs. Appeal from Superior Court. This was an action of trespass to recover damages for the diversion of the waters of a private stream called Ridley creek. The following facts appear by the report of this case in 10 Pa. Superior Ct. 132: The plaintiff at the time of the commencement of this action, on January 31, 1894, was the owner of a tract of land of about 100 acres, situate on both sides of Ridley…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The opinion of the Superior Court in this case is so clear, convincing and exhaustive, covering, as it does, all the contentions of the appellants, that it would be impossible for us to add anything of value to it. We therefore affirm the judgment on the opinion of the learned president judge of the Superior Court.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Village of Four Seasons Ass'n v. Elk Mountain Ski Resort, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Martin v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Diehm v. New Holland BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Sebree v. Huntingdon Water Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.