Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1932No. Appeals, 50 and 52PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The Philadelphia Suburban Water Company, by resolution of its board of directors on October 25, 1927, sought to condemn and appropriate 10,000,000 gallons of water per day of the normal flow of Perkiomen Creek, the principal tributary of the Schuylkill River. On November 7, 1928, the City of Philadelphia filed a bill in equity in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, averring that if the company be permitted to appropriate and divert any part of the flow of Perkiomen Creek, grave and substantial injury would result to the city and its inhabitants, inasmuch…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New Jersey v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Carson v. BlazerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1810
  3. Philadelphia Clay Co. v. York Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Feuerstein v. New Century Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Boalsburg Water Co. v. State College Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Huffman Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Myers v. MarquetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Delaware River Basin Commission v. Bucks County Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Hayes v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Search EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API