Legal Opinion

Diehm v. New Holland Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1937No. Appeal, 62PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The defendant has appealed from a judgment for $1,250 obtained by plaintiff in an action of trespass.

The plaintiff is the owner of a farm in Lancaster county, through which runs a stream, known as Mill Creek, from which he obtains water .for domestic purposes, stock, and for other uses in connection with the conduct of his farm. Mill Creek rises in the Welsh mountains and is fed by a number of contributory streams.

The defendant, in 1930, purchased a tract of land about a mile and a half east of plaintiff’s property, on which are located the Miller springs. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. King v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Mintzer v. GreenoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Brown Et Ux. v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API