Legal Opinion
Riverland Oil Co. v. Chisholm
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 11, 1930No. 18690PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
This plaintiff, Lamar L. Chisholm, sued Chas. Jones and A. E. McKenzie, individually, and as composing the partnership of Jones & McKenzie, the I. X. L. Drilling Company, a corporation, and the River-land Oil Company, a corporation.
The substance of the allegations of plaintiff’s petition necessary to an understanding of the question presented by this appeal is as follows: • That prior to April 5, 1926, he was sound in mind and body; had been a tool dresser for several years in the operations of drilling for oil and gas in the Mid-Continent field, and particularly in Okfuskee county,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Producers' Lumber Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Marion Shoe Co. v. EppleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beasley v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Maloney Tank Mfg. Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hatley v. MOBIL PIPE LINE COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973