Legal Opinion

Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Archdiocese of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1993No. USDC CV-88-934-HJF; USCA 91-35610; SC S40077PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*113GILLETTE, J.

In this insurance case, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified five questions of law to this court. See generally ORS 28.200 to 28.255 (statutes governing certification). The questions certified to this court were the following:

“1. Under Oregon law, does the phrase ‘occurrence happening during the period of insurance’ refer to the occurrence of the damage or the occurrence of the act which caused the injury? See Interstate, 747 F. Supp. at 622.
“2. If occurrence refers to the act causing injury, does the tort of negligent supervision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Archdiocese of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1990

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Groshong v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Dewsnup v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Archdiocese of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Farmers Insurance v. MunsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API