Legal Opinion

Namvar v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 9, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (board) decided that the plaintiff was not injured “while in the performance of’ her duties, relying on 1959 opinions of this court. See Boston Retirement Bd. v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 340 Mass. 112, 112-113 (1959) (employee injured on employer’s premises while returning to work after lunch, not injured “while in the performance” of her duties); Boston Retirement Bd. v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 340 Mass. 109, 109, 111 (1959) (employee who fell on employer’s premises while on way home to lunch, not injured “while in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boston Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Boston Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Richard v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Damiano v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  5. Gardner v. Worcester Regional Retirement BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API