Damiano v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.
We consider once again the strict causation requirement that must be met in order for public employees to obtain accidental disability retirement benefits under G. L. c. 32, § 7(1).1 See Richard v. Retirement Bd. of Worcester, 431 Mass. 163, 167 (2000). While working as a 911 dispatcher for the city of Brockton police department, Teresa Damiano was injured in a fall due to the horseplay of a fellow employee. Damiano *260injured her At the time her desk w then to a si quired for retirement ight wi the hoi Ith the ipply ro her job oenefits, st and elbow and could not return to work, ¡eplay began,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lisbon v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Hough v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- City of Lynn v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Boston Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Namvar v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murphy v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- State Board of Retirement v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Hunter v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Rothstein v. Contributory Ret. Appeal Bd.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018