Legal Opinion

Richard v. Retirement Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 7, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a decision of a judge in the Superior Court affirming the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board’s denial of her application for accidental disability retirement benefits pursuant to G. L. c. 32, § 7. We granted a joint application of the parties for direct appellate review and affirm.

The plaintiff, a public health nurse employed by the city of Worcester (city) and assigned to work in the city’s public schools, was injured in an automobile accident while driving from her home to her first school assignment of the workday. The plaintiff regularly drove her personal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lisbon v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Hough v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. School Committee v. Education Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. National Ass'n of Government Employees v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Boston Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Damiano v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  4. Ballotte v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Gardner v. Worcester Regional Retirement BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API