Marmet Coal Co. v. People's Coal Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Action by the People’s Coal Company against the Marmet Coal Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, an¿ defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
On May 31, 1911, plaintiff contracted in writing for the sale to the defendant of 55 secondhand coal barges, at an aggregate price of $53,632, less a discount of 5 per cent.; 33 of the barges were then empty ánd ready for delivery; the others were loaded. For the 33 empty barges notes were to be at once taken at 90, 180, and 270 days. The remaining 22 barges were to be turned over as soon as empty “at their present location,” notes to be given as in the case of the 33 mentioned. The first 32 barges were settled for June 1, 1911. June 29, 1911, 6 more barges were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Telluride Power Transmission Co. v. Crane Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Union Selling Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co. v. RoddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- E. H. Taylor, Jr., & Sons, Inc. v. First Nat. Bank of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wildman Mfg. Co. v. Davenport Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Centennial Ins. v. Vic Tanny International of Toledo, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Tinius Olsen Testing MacHine Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- W. S. Maxwell Co. v. Southern Oregon Gas Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Stark Electric R. v. McGinty Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.