Loosli v. City of Salem
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*505EDMONDS, J.
Plaintiffs appeal after the trial court granted summary judgment to defendant City of Salem on plaintiffs’ negligence claim. We affirm.
We state the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the nonmoving parties. ORCP 47 C. Plaintiffs desired to open a vehicle dealership in Salem and found an available lot on Commercial Street that they believed to be an advantageous location. On two occasions, one of the plaintiffs telephoned the city to find out if any zoning restrictions on the property prohibited it from being used as a vehicle sales business. On both occasions, a city…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Scovill v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Loosli v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Bell v. Public Employees Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Loosli v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007