Legal Opinion

Loosli v. City of Salem

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2008No. CC 04C-17616; CA A130044; SC S055509PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

The question in this case is when a public body that provides information pursuant to a statute will be liable for negligently providing incorrect information. The trial court ruled, on summary judgment, that defendant City of Salem owed plaintiffs no statutory or other duty and thus was not responsible for any economic damages that plaintiffs suffered as a result of the city’s negligence in providing information. A divided, en banc Court of Appeals affirmed. Loosli v. City of Salem, 215 Or App 502, 170 P3d 1084 (2007). We allowed plaintiffs’ petition for review and now affirm the Court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Loosli v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Towe v. Sacagawea, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Riverview Condominium Ass'n v. Cypress Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Synectic Ventures I, LLC v. EVI Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Masood v. Safeco InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API