Legal Opinion

Bell v. Public Employees Retirement Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 2010No. 07C11097; A140350PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Plaintiff is a retired member of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), which is administered by defendant, the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB). Plaintiff alleged that PERB negligently provided her with inflated estimates of her retirement benefits and that, in reliance on those estimates, she retired earlier than she otherwise would have, to her economic detriment in the amount of $200,707. Defendant answered that plaintiffs claim lacked merit for two reasons: first, it was barred by ORS 238.455(6), set out below, under which a PERS member has no right to estimated benefits…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Scovill v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Strader v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hettle v. Construction Contractors BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Regence Group v. Tig Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  3. Western Property Holdings, LLC v. Aequitas Capital Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. BCBSM, Inc. v. Walgreen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Chambers v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees International Union, AFL-CIODistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API