Heenan & Finlen v. Parmele
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Custer county: Bruno O. Hostetler, Judge. The following opinion on rehearing was filed November 6, 1908. Former judgment of reversal vacated and judgment of district court affirmed:
1Opinion of the Court
Good, C. ,
This is an action to enforce specific performance of a contract for the conveyance.of lands in Custer county, Nebraska, and.is before this court a second time. The former opinion, entitled Parmele v. Heenan & Finlen, appears in 75 Neb. 535. After the cause was remanded upon the former hearing in this court to the district court, an amended petition was filed, alleging, among other things, that since the former trial the copartnership, of Heenan & Finlen had been dissolved, and that Daniel H. Heenan had succeeded to all rights of the'copartnership, and making Heenan in his individual…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Morgan v. BergenNebraska Supreme Court · 1874
- Ruzicka v. HotovyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Griggs v. OakNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Grover, Inc. v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Ruplinger v. RuplingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Wright v. NegusNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Wellensiek v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1961