Legal Opinion

Ruplinger v. Ruplinger

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1951No. 32978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an action by plaintiff, Richard B. Ruplinger, to recover for the fraudulent conversion of property and money by the defendants, Edward J. Ruplinger and Emma F. Ruplinger. Defendants filed general demurrers to the petition last filed, which were sustained by the trial court. Plaintiff failed to plead further, and a judgment of dismissal was entered. Plaintiff appeals.

The allegations of the petition are substantially as follows: Plaintiff and Edward J. Ruplinger are brothers. The defendants are husband and wife. In 1920 plaintiff constructed a warehouse in Scottsbluff, Nebraska. The two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brictson v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  2. Rettinger ex rel. Standard Oil Co. v. PierpontNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Cullum v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Wilhelm v. Consolidated Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  5. Hodge v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. K. Buck Retail Stores v. HarkertNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Wells Fargo Ag Credit Corp. v. BattermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wellensiek v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Roy and Roy Development LLC v. Banco Popular De Puerto RicoSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API