Legal Opinion

Wright v. Negus

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1923No. 22574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Redick, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover damages for the refusal of the defendant to convey 480 acres of land claimed to have been purchased by the plaintiff under a contract con--, sisting of five letters and telegrams passing between the parties in following terms:

“Nickerson, Neb., July 22, 1918.
“C. E. Negus: Have heard nothing from you since our conversation on train, can handle three quarters at thirty per acre pay you nine thousand four hundred, you carry five thousand back, am on deal for another piece land which must close at once, wire if you are ready deal on above…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ballou v. SherwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ruzicka v. HotovyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Powers v. BohuslavNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Holliday v. McWilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Adams v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. v. George & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. David v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Shelhamer v. O'NeillNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API