Legal Opinion

Sulzer v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1988No. 86CA1857PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Judge.

Plaintiffs, James E. Sulzer, James Rash, and Daniel Scheuren, appeal a judgment in favor of defendants, Mid-Century Insurance Company, Farmers Insurance Company, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. We affirm.

Plaintiffs were injured in separate automobile accidents. Each plaintiff had a complying Colorado No-Fault Insurance Policy from one of the defendants. Because of their injuries, plaintiffs were unable to return to work, and each requested vocational rehabilitation benefits as contemplated under § 10-4-706(l)(c), C.R.S. (1987 Repl. Yol. 4A). The insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Rancho Colorado, Inc. v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Krieg v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sulzer v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API