Sulzer v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Judge.
Plaintiffs, James E. Sulzer, James Rash, and Daniel Scheuren, appeal a judgment in favor of defendants, Mid-Century Insurance Company, Farmers Insurance Company, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. We affirm.
Plaintiffs were injured in separate automobile accidents. Each plaintiff had a complying Colorado No-Fault Insurance Policy from one of the defendants. Because of their injuries, plaintiffs were unable to return to work, and each requested vocational rehabilitation benefits as contemplated under § 10-4-706(l)(c), C.R.S. (1987 Repl. Yol. 4A). The insurance…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Rancho Colorado, Inc. v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Krieg v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sulzer v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990