Legal Opinion
Sulzer v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 9, 1990No. 88SC354PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum
In Sulzer v. Mid-Century Insurance Co., 765 P.2d 606 (Colo.App.1988), the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment holding that under applicable provisions of the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act, §§ 10-4-701 to -723, 4A C.R.S. (1987) (hereinafter the Act), petitioners James E. Sulzer, James Rash and Daniel Scheuren were not entitled to subsistence expense payments under conforming no-fault contracts of insurance issued by respondents Mid-Century Insurance Company, Farmers Insurance Exchange, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Having granted certiorari to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Grover v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Leland v. Travelers Indem. Co. of IllinoisColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sulzer v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by11 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Colby Ex Rel. Colby v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Dean v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Estate of Hill v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Estate of Hays ex rel. Hays v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.