Krieg v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review two lower court judgments concerning the construction of section 10-4-706(l)(d)(I) of the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (No Fault Act), §§ 10-4-701 to 723, 4 C.R.S. (1973 & 1983 Supp.), which authorizes the payment of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits for loss of income “during a period commencing the day after the date of the accident, and not exceeding fifty-two additional weeks.” In one of the cases, Krieg v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. (No. 83SC208), the Denver Superior Court construed the phrase “fifty-two…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Cingoranelli v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Mountain Mobile Mix, Inc. v. GiffordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Adams v. Safeco Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kokins v. Teleflex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Bill Boom Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Scoggins v. Unigard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Thompson v. Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.