Legal Opinion

Krieg v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 20, 1984No. 83SC208, 83SC433PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review two lower court judgments concerning the construction of section 10-4-706(l)(d)(I) of the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (No Fault Act), §§ 10-4-701 to 723, 4 C.R.S. (1973 & 1983 Supp.), which authorizes the payment of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits for loss of income “during a period commencing the day after the date of the accident, and not exceeding fifty-two additional weeks.” In one of the cases, Krieg v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. (No. 83SC208), the Denver Superior Court construed the phrase “fifty-two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Cingoranelli v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Mountain Mobile Mix, Inc. v. GiffordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Adams v. Safeco Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kokins v. Teleflex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Bill Boom Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Scoggins v. Unigard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Thompson v. Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API