Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hogan Lovells U.S., L.L.P. v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2018No. 2016-1776PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

*57{¶ 1} In this original action, relators, Elizabeth A. Och and Hogan Lovells U.S., L.L.P. (collectively, "Hogan Lovells"), seek *931a writ of mandamus to compel respondent, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction ("DRC"), to release records related to DRC's acquisition and supply of lethal-injection drugs. We grant the request for a writ of mandamus in part and deny it in part.

Background

{¶ 2} Hogan Lovells U.S., L.L.P., which employs Elizabeth Och, is an international law firm. On March 7, 2016, Hogan Lovells sent correspondence to DRC's public-information e-mail address requesting "copies…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Summit CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Morgan v. StricklandOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Data Trace Information Services, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Fiscal OfficerOhio Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McDougald v. Greene (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Viola v. Cuyahoga Cty. Pros. OfficeOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State ex rel. Hogan Lovells U.S., L.L.P. v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Ullmann v. Klein (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Claims · 2020

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API