Legal Opinion
Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. Auchenbach
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 7, 1926No. 3460PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
This case, tried twice, is now under review on the second writ of error. For the facts in detail we refer to our opinion on the first writ of error. Auchenbach v. P. & R. Ry. Co. (C. C. A.) 8 F.(2d) 350. The evidence, substantially the same at both trials, developed'undisputed facts which, stated very briefly, are as follows :
A coupling was about to be made between two drafts of freight ears, one standing alone and the other attached to an engine. The plaintiff, rear brakeman of the train crew, stood ready to complete the connection. It was dark. When the moving draft…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Myers v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Honas H. Richards v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Didinger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Reetz v. Chicago & ER Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Newkirk v. Los Angeles Junction Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.