Didinger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
This is an action brought under section 2 of the Safety Appliance Act (45 U. S. C. § 11 [45 USCA § 11]), wherein plaintiff seeks to predicate liability- upon the use of a freight car equipped with an inefficient hand brake. A verdict for the defendant was directed at the close of the opening statement by plaintiff’s counsel to the jury.
This section imposes an absolute and unqualified duty upon interstate railroads to equip and maintain hand brakes in an efficient condition. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Hooven, 297 F. 919 (C. C. A. 6); Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. Howell, 6…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. GotschallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. HoovenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Myers v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
- Honas H. Richards v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Lawrence M. Miller v. Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Newkirk v. Los Angeles Junction Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.