Honas H. Richards v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This appeal arises from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant-appellee Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) in this action filed under the Federal Safety Appliances Act (“FSAA”), 49 U.S.C. §§ 20301-20306, the Federal Employee Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, and the Federal Boiler Inspection Act (“BIA”), 49 U.S.C. §§ 20701-20703. Plaintiff-Appellant Ho-nas Richards (“Richards”) challenges the district court’s dismissal of his FSAA claim, 1 arguing that the court erred in finding that he failed to produce sufficient evidence…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- O'Donnell v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Myers v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Coray v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Raab v. Utah Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- Crestview Parke Care Center v. Tommy Thompson United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- James Szekeres v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Szekeres v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.