People v. Gallego
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.
This case of first impression requires us to decide whether defendant, aggrieved by the breach of an unauthorized, non-plea agreement with the police, providing that he not be prosecuted, is entitled to specific performance of that agreement. We hold that he is not and that, *446on the facts of this case, suppression or exclusion of the written agreement made with the police and of the "buy money” is a more appropriate remedy. Thus, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
i
This interlocutory appeal arises out of a drug transaction involving defendant Luis Gallego, his codefendant Albert…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BlueSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. ReaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. TomaMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. SierbMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. StipetichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- State v. HansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.