Peru Plow & Wheel Co. v. Ward
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Memorandum. — Error from Republic district court; F. W. Sturges, judge. Action by the Peru Plow and Wheel Company against R. B. Ward. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Carver, J. :
Under date of February 1, 1887, R. B. Ward became security for M. W. Ward and Thomas Ward for the payment of an indebtedness of $1/654.38, to the Peru Plow and Wheel Company, and as security signed three notes for $551.46 each, due and payable, unconditionally, in one, two, and three years, respectively, after date. As additional security, and before accepting said notes, said company demanded and received from M. W. Ward a mortgage *7on certain real estate in the town of Scandia, the mortgage stating that it was given to secure said notes,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Paine v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Mayhew v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Coburn v. WebbIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Wright v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Stanclift v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bright v. MackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- First Nat'l Bank of Anthony v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
- Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911
- Schiltz v. WokalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942