Bright v. Mack
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Cullman Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. James E. Horton, Jr. Bill by J. M. Bright against John Mack and others, to foreclose a mortgage, and for a decree against sureties. From a decree for respondent complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMayfield, J.
The bill is primarily to foreclose a mortgage, and incidentally seeks a decree against the sureties, who signed several notes secured by the mortgage, for the balance due after the mortgaged property was sold, and also seeks a decree against parties who had acquired or converted certain property covered by the mortgage.
(1, 2) The case made by the bill, and the findings of the chancellor in respect thereto, is well stated by the chancellor as follows:
“The main purpose of the bill is the foreclosure of a mortgage against the defendants, John Mack and Charles Mack, and, in case the proceeds of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- City Council v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Mayhew v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Anderson v. Bellenger & RallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Flynn v. Mudd & HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commercial Credit Co. v. EisenhourArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Bradley v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Tennessee-Hermitage Nat. Bank v. HaganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Croghan v. Savings Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1935
- Eagerton v. Vision BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.