Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Ins.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1884PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Page Ciremt Court. Action upon an alleged parol contract of insurance. There was atrial toa jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

1. MEE insurance: oral contract for: astorondi-n tions of. This case is before us upon a second appeal. The first opinion is reported in 58 Iowa, 487. Upon the trial from which this appeal is taken, the court . x 1 gave two instructions, which are as follows: ° 5 “6. .Ruy fimcl from the evidence that the plaintiff entered into, a contract of insurance with the defendant’s agent, and that both plaintiff and defendant contracted in view of all the conditions stipulated in the blank policy of insurance set forth as an exhibit to the fourth count of the defendant’s answer, then the plaintiff, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hubbard & Spencer v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. De Grove v. . Metropolitan Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Lumbert & Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  4. Smith v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Security Ins. Co. of New Haven v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Cleveland Oil Co. v. Norwich Ins. SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Johnson v. Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Barre v. Council Bluffs InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. North British & Mercantile Ins. v. Luck's Strike Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API