Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 7, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Page Circuit Court. Action upon a parol contract of insurance. There was a trial to a jury. Yerdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

1. PRACTICE: re-opening case: witness delayed. After the parties< had rested and two arguments had been made in the case, the defendant moved to re-open the case, and for leave to introduce further -1 ' testimony. The conrt overruled the motion, and •> 7 the overruling is assigned as error.

*488The defendant company is located at the city of Des Moines. It was shown by affidavit that the secretary of the company, one Long, was a material witness in behalf of the defendant; that Clarinda, the county seat of Page county, where the trial took place, was to be reached from Des Moines by a circuitous…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Great American Casualty Co. v. EichelbergerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Railway Co. v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Smith v. State Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Gee v. MossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API