Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 22, 1986No. 84 Civ. 4094 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Pan American World Airways (“Pan Am”) has moved this court to reconsider its September 16, 1986 opinion in Robinson v. Pan American World Airways, 645 F.Supp. 70 (S.D.N.Y.1986). The motion for reconsideration is granted and upon reconsideration the opinion will stand as filed.
In its motion to reconsider, Pan Am argues that the court’s holding on the subject of equitable estoppel is inconsistent with the weight of authority in the Southern District and in particular with the rule set down in Anisfield v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., 631 F.Supp. 1461, 1466…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harry L. DILLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Cerbone v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Anisfeld v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Donald Robinson, Richard Hill, Charles M. Adams, James Wolfanger, Karl Rahn and Ronald Fregara v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lund v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- International Minerals & Resources, Inc. v. PappasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Hitachi Automotive Products USA, Inc. v. CraigKentucky Supreme Court · 2008