Legal Opinion

Shields v. Shields

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided January 20, 1939No. 16PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLET, District Judge.

Habeas Corpus. Romie B. Shields is deprived of his liberty upon the ground that he is insane. Application is made to this Court for his release. By agreement of the parties certain legal questions are presented in advance of a consideration of the sanity of petitioner. Therefore, for the purposes of the determination of the questions now presented petitioner will be assumed to be sane, otherwise remand would follow regardless of any considerations affecting the jurisdiction of this Court or any lack of regularity in the proceedings leading to his restraint. King v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. In Re MayfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Hunt v. SearcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. In Re ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. KahaneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  2. In Re the Welfare of HoutsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Beil v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. Blevins v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Blevins v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API