Legal Opinion

Charles Houff, et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 30, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01150Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES HOUFF, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01150-DC-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ REQUESTS TO SEAL 14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., DOCUMENTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 15 Defendants. JUDGMENT AND IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITIONS TO 16 DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 17 (Doc. Nos. 67, 72, 79, 86) 18 19 20 On December 16, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a notice of their request to file under seal 21 documents relating to their motion for summary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Welsh v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API