Legal Opinion
Maloy v. Griffith
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 21, 1952No. 16624PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter
Bernard F. Maloy, James J. Carter and Patricia H. Maloy, individually and doing business as Maloy, Carter and Maloy, instituted an action based on false and fraudulent representations respecting a certain lease, claiming that by reason thereof they had been damaged in the sum of $5,000.00 actual and $10,000.00 exemplary damages, for which they sought judgment against Donald I. and Gladys May Griffith, the owners of the premises.
The Griffiths answered, denying false and fraudulent representations as alleged by plaintiffs and also filed, a cross complaint in which they sought damages in the sum…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mustang Reservoir, Canal & Land Co. v. HissmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. ReuterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. BelkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Sowder v. InhelderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Lynch v. Kuhlmann Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lewis v. Buckskin Joe's, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Robert C. Ozer, PC v. BorquezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- South Park Aggregates, Inc. v. Northwestern National Insurance Co. of Milwaukee, WisconsinColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Martin v. Opdyke Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Warner v. BarnardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.