Legal Opinion

Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. Reuter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 1, 1919No. 9422PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Arapahoe District Court, Hon. Jesse C. Wiley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Suit was by Paul Reuter to recover damages for the alleged destruction of a bridge built by him across an irrigating canal belonging to plaintiff in error. The canal divides into two parts certain land owned by Reuter, in Arapahoe County. The complaint originally contained two causes of action, one in trespass, and one in ejectment, the latter was abandoned. 'The jury found the issues generally in favor of the plaintiff, and returned answers to certain special interrogatories. By the verdict actual damages were assessed in the sum of $1,225.00, and plaintiff was also allowed $1,000.00…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tynon v. DespainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  2. Graybill v. CorlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  3. Gyra v. WindlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Arthur Irrigation Co. v. StrayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. De Graffenried v. SavageColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Utah State Fair Ass'n v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kendall v. HargraveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Neilson v. BowlesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  4. Maloy v. GriffithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  5. Washburn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API