Legal Opinion
Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1994No. 92 Civ. 8758 (MEL), 94 Civ. 1272 (MEL)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these actions allege a variety of soft tissue and other injuries, including “carpal tunnel” syndrome, which they contend were caused by the repetitive stress involved in the use of keyboards manufactured by Atex, Inc., now known as 805 Middlesex Corp.
Eastman Kodak Company, Atex’s parent company, moves for summary judgment dismissing all claims against it in both actions. Kodak’s identical motion in related cases pending in state court was recently granted. King v. Eastman Kodak Co., No. 23439/92 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. Jun. 9,1994). However, the decision in King…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Greene v. HellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Geyer v. Ingersoll Publications Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,517 Kalb, Voorhis & Co. v. American Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Sweeney, Cohn, Stahl & Vaccaro v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Joiner v. Ryder System Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1996
- Sonnenblick-Goldman Co. v. ITT Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.