Legal Opinion

Castagna & Son, Inc. v. Alan Michel Plumbing, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The subcontract between respondent and petitioner Castagna contains no provision for arbitration. Rather, it provides for determination of any controversy pursuant to the New York Simplified Procedure for Court Determination of Disputes, provided no other provision of the subcontract or of the construction contract between Castagna and petitioner Church Charity Foundation “provides for a determination thereof by other means.”

For a number of reasons the construction contract cannot be said to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. In re the Arbitration between American Rail & Steel Co. & India Supply MissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Gutman v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API