Brown v. Howard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McLUCAS, J., pro tem.
This is an action for money had and received. Defendants appeal from a judgment rendered for plaintiff.
In the year 1922 an action was commenced by Leota Howard, one of the defendants herein, to foreclose a chattel mortgage, in which action the plaintiff and respondent was one of the parties defendant. Judgment was rendered against the plaintiff herein as defendant in that action. Execution was issued thereon and under the said execution the sheriff of Los Angeles County levied upon the property of the plaintiff herein and collected the sum of $907, which sum, on December…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Rickert v. PollockAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berger v. Dixon & Snow, P.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Excel Corp. v. JimenezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Ljepava v. M.L.S.C. Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Excel Corp. v. JimenezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Hall v. Napa County Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.