Legal Opinion

Rickert v. Pollock

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $114 and costs.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The defendants are attorneys-at-law, and as such represented certain parties plaintiff in two actions brought against the plaintiff in this action in the City Court, to wit, the case of Klein v. Bernard Larger, as President of the United Garment Workers of America, and the case of Goldman v. Bernard Larger, as President of the United Garment Workers of America. In these two actions judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs therein on or about December 10, 1903, and appeals to the Appellate Term, were taken by the defendant. These two appeals were subsequently dismissed on motion of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. . ElwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Herzfeld v. ReinachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Mohamed v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Joan Mohamed v. Kevin KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API