Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. Kelly Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 7, 2010No. 3:09-mj-00405PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#49) on May 26, 2010, in which he recommends this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (# 36). The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.1983). See also Lorin…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sereno-Morales v. Cascade Food Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Homeland Insurance Company of New York v. CentiMark CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Vicki Heisen v. Legacy HealthDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026