Legal Opinion
State v. Wells
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 20, 2009No. AC 28536PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER,
J.
The defendant, Ryshon Wells, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. The defendant claims that the court (1) improperly found that he violated conditions of his probation and (2) abused its discretion in revoking his probation and ordering him to serve the unexecuted portion of his original sentence. We conclude that part of the first claim is moot and dismiss that portion of the appeal. We decline to address the remaining issues raised in the first claim and find no merit in the second claim. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Fagan v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. PrestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. DWIGHT G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. BenjaminConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013