Legal Opinion

University of Michigan v. Pray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933No. Calendar 36,872PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding by which plaintiff seeks to compel payment of drain bonds from general funds of Washtenaw county, relying particularly upon that portion of. 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4937, which reads:

“In case the amount available in the drain fund shall be insufficient to pay the principal or interest of any such bonds heretofore or hereafter issued when they become due the same' shall be advanced and paid by the county out of its general funds and reimbursement to said general fund shall be made out of the drain taxes thereafter collected.”

After hearing in the circuit court, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Moore v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Miller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. People v. StimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. MiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re Lewis' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Midland Township v. State Boundary CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Attorney General Ex Rel. Eaves v. State Bridge CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API